當對方用右手拉你右手時,兩種不同應對

 

當對方用右手拉你右手時,兩種不同應對

一、當對方用右手拉你右手時,為何有兩種不同應對?

你問的是:

  • 為何有時用左手斜角推?

  • 為何不順勢跟著他的拉力再反送?

  • 這是不是兩種不同打法?

答案是:是的,這是兩種不同的戰略選擇。


二、第一種:順勢借力反送(沿原線反擊)

這種方法的核心是:

順勢 → 吸收 → 借力 → 原線反送

當對方拉你右手時:

  • 你不抗

  • 維持掤勁結構

  • 讓他拉的力量延伸出去

  • 等他力到極點

  • 再沿原線把力量送回去

適合情況:

  • 對方拉得過大

  • 對方重心後仰

  • 對方失去根

這是典型的:

借其力,還其身


三、第二種:左手斜開入隅(破中入角)

這種是完全不同的思維。

你不沿他的拉力線反擊,而是:

  • 改變角度

  • 入他的隅角

  • 破他的中軸

  • 攻擊他結構最弱的方向

當他拉你右手時:

  • 他的力量往後

  • 他的側角往往打開

  • 他的中心產生空隙

  • 你的左手從斜角切入

  • 攻其不備

這叫:

不走其線,破其角


四、為什麼不總是順勢反送?

因為順著他的線走,就是在他的節奏裡。

若對方拉得很巧:

  • 可能在引你

  • 可能要轉化為挒

  • 可能要化為採或肘

若你一直在線上反擊:

  • 你仍在他的時間裡

  • 你沒有改變主動權

斜開入隅:

  • 改變向量

  • 改變節奏

  • 改變力的方向

  • 往往更容易破壞其根


五、兩種其實是兩種戰略哲學

方法思維核心原則
順勢反送借力順勢借力
斜角入隅破角入隅破中

兩者都正確。

選擇取決於:

  • 對方重心

  • 對方方向

  • 當下空隙

  • 距離與時間


六、力學上的差別

順勢反送

  • 向量反轉

  • 在同一條力線上

  • 屬於能量交換

斜開入隅

  • 創造新向量

  • 改變接觸平面

  • 破壞平衡軸線

  • 結構破壞力更強


七、更高層的理解

真正高階推手不是:

「我用哪一招?」

而是:

「此刻對方結構最弱在哪?」

如果他後傾 —— 原線反送。
如果他側開 —— 入隅破角。
如果他旋轉失衡 —— 轉化成挒。

高層不是固定套路,而是:

因結構而變。


八、總結一句話

順勢反送,是借其力。
斜角入隅,是破其根。

兩者皆可。
高低不在技法,而在判斷。



細說八法

 細說八法:

Retreat: as the body sits back, the right hand gradually yields inward under the incoming force until it reaches the torso. At that point, the body structure (through the chest) receives and absorbs the force.

掤的高低角度

掤的高低角度

1️⃣ In Traditional Taiji Theory

In the classical Eight Gates (Peng, Lu, Ji, An, Cai, Lie, Zhou, Kao):

  • Peng (掤) is one energy.

  • It is not originally divided into “low Peng,” “level Peng,” or “diagonal Peng.”

Classically, Peng is:

An expansive structural energy that supports and fills in all directions.

It is not defined by height or angle.


2️⃣ In Modern Teaching & Coaching

However, in modern instruction — especially in push-hands and competition routines — teachers sometimes use descriptive terms such as:

  • Low Peng

  • Level Peng

  • Diagonal Peng

  • Upward Peng

  • Downward Peng

These are not separate jins (energies).
They are directional applications of Peng structure.

So they are pedagogical terms, not classical categories.


3️⃣ How to Say It Properly in English

Instead of saying:

❌ “There are low Peng, level Peng, and diagonal Peng as different techniques.”

It is better to say:

Peng can be expressed in different directions, such as low, level, or diagonal, depending on body structure and incoming force.

Or more precise:

Although classical theory defines Peng as a unified expansive energy, in practice it may manifest at different heights or angles, such as low, level, or diagonal applications.


4️⃣ Important Theoretical Clarification

Peng is not about:

  • arm position

  • height

  • angle

Peng is about:

  • structural expansion

  • connected body alignment

  • internal support

  • elastic integrity

The direction is secondary.


5️⃣ For Your Push-Hands Manual

If you want a professional explanation, you could write:

Peng is a unified expansive energy. While it may be applied at different levels or angles in practice (low, level, diagonal), these are directional variations rather than distinct categories of jin.

That would sound internationally refined and theoretically accurate.

Excellent. Let’s go deeper — structurally, biomechanically, and theoretically — and keep it suitable for your international push-hands documentation.


1️⃣ Vertical Peng vs Diagonal Peng

(Biomechanics + Structure)

🔹 Vertical Peng

This expresses upward or buoyant expansion.

Characteristics:

  • Dantian slightly lifts and expands.

  • Spine elongates upward.

  • Kua remains open (not locked).

  • Force rises through skeletal alignment, not muscular lifting.

Biomechanically:
Ground reaction force travels:

Foot → Kua → Spine → Arm/Chest → Upward vector

Used when:

  • Receiving downward pressure

  • Neutralizing a collapsing force

  • Protecting central axis

It feels like:

A column inflating vertically.


🔹 Diagonal Peng

This expresses expansion along a corner angle (四隅).

Characteristics:

  • Dantian rotates slightly.

  • One kua opens more than the other.

  • Structure forms a spiral line.

  • Expansion travels along an oblique plane.

Biomechanically:
Force vector:

Rear foot → Kua rotation → Spine spiral → Shoulder/Arm → Diagonal outward line

Used when:

  • Redirecting force

  • Entering the opponent’s corner

  • Transforming into Ji or Kao

It feels like:

A sphere expanding toward a corner.


2️⃣ Chest Peng vs Arm Peng

This distinction is very important.


🔹 Arm Peng

What beginners often do:

  • Arm expands outward.

  • Elbow rounds.

  • But torso is passive.

This is local Peng.

Problem:

  • Easily collapses if shoulder disconnects.

  • Structure breaks under pressure.


🔹 Chest Peng

More advanced:

  • Sternum slightly rounded (not puffed).

  • Back expands (拔背).

  • Ribcage supported by dantian.

Here, Peng is not in the arm —
it is in the whole torso structure.

When force comes:

  • Chest does not collapse.

  • Back does not arch.

  • Structure absorbs and redistributes.

It is:

Whole-body Peng expressed through the chest.

This is why in retreat:

You first establish chest Peng → then contain → then transform into Lu.


3️⃣ How Peng Transforms into Ji and Kao

This is the most important dynamic relationship.

Peng is not separate from the others.

It is the base elastic structure.


🔹 Peng → Ji

Ji (Press) happens when:

  • Two arms converge.

  • Expansion compresses forward.

Mechanically:

  • Peng expands outward.

  • Rotation gathers it inward.

  • Vector becomes forward compression.

So:

Ji is compressed Peng.

Without Peng:

  • Ji becomes muscular pushing.

  • Structure collapses.


🔹 Peng → Kao

Kao requires:

  • Peng integrity in the torso.

  • Rotational support.

  • Ground connection.

When Peng expands through torso,
and you rotate and enter,

that expansion becomes body strike.

So:

Kao is Peng supported by mass and rotation.

Without Peng:

  • Kao becomes a shoulder bump.

  • No internal support.


4️⃣ Relationship Summary

EnergyStructural BaseTransformation Mechanism
PengExpansive integrityFoundation
JiCompressed PengConverging structure
KaoMass-supported PengRotational entry
LuDissolving PengYielding spiral

5️⃣ Unified Concept (Advanced Level)

Peng is not:

  • An arm technique

  • A height

  • An angle

Peng is:

Three-dimensional structural elasticity.

Low Peng, level Peng, diagonal Peng are:

  • directional expressions

  • not separate energies

Chest Peng and Arm Peng are:

  • degrees of integration

Ji and Kao are:

  • transformations of Peng under compression and rotation


當對方用右手拉你右手時,兩種不同應對

  當對方用右手拉你右手時,兩種不同應對 一、當對方用右手拉你右手時,為何有兩種不同應對? 你問的是: 為何有時用左手斜角推? 為何不順勢跟著他的拉力再反送? 這是不是兩種不同打法? 答案是: 是的,這是兩種不同的戰略選擇。 二、第一種:順勢借力反送...